The model in one line
High needs funding works in three parts: a school’s core per-pupil budget, the first £6,000 per pupil the school funds itself, then council top-up funding above £6,000, usually for pupils with an EHCP. The Department for Education calls these Element 1, Element 2 and Element 3, and the same structure applies in 2026 to 2027 as in the year before. (An EHCP is an Education, Health and Care plan — the statutory plan that sets out a pupil’s needs and the provision to meet them.)
What each element pays for
Element 1 is the core money every pupil attracts through the school’s funding formula — the basic per-pupil amount that funds mainstream teaching. It is not SEN money as such; it is the baseline every place is built on.
Element 2 is up to £6,000 per pupil of additional support a school is expected to fund from its own delegated budget before it can claim anything from the council. Councils flag this money as the notional SEN budget — an identified slice of the school’s budget share, calculated using the £6,000 per-pupil threshold, that the school is expected to use for pupils with special educational needs.
Element 3 is ‘top-up’ funding: the cost of a pupil’s provision above the £6,000 line, paid per pupil by the local authority from its high needs block. In practice this almost always attaches to a pupil with an EHCP, and many councils will only agree top-up where a plan is in place — so an EHC needs assessment and the funding question often travel together.
The qualifier most summaries miss
Two things the headline three-part description leaves out matter a great deal when budgets are tight. First, the notional SEN budget is indicative, not ring-fenced. DfE guidance is explicit that it is neither a target nor a constraint: a school can spend more or less than the figure, and spending below it does not reduce the school’s statutory duty to use its best endeavours to secure the provision a pupil’s SEN calls for.
Second, the £6,000 threshold has been frozen in cash terms since it was introduced in 2013/14. Because it has never been uprated for inflation, the Institute for Fiscal Studies finds it has fallen by more than a quarter in real terms. The practical effect is mechanical: as the real value of the line erodes, more pupils’ needs cross it, drawing more of them into the group that needs top-up funding — for which an EHCP is, in practice, often the gateway.
Is this about to change?
Possibly, but not soon. The Schools White Paper published on 23 February 2026, with statutory change proposed through the Education for All Bill, sets out a reformed model: a statutory Individual Support Plan duty for a wider group of pupils, and EHCPs narrowed towards the most complex needs. These are proposals. The Government has signalled no changes before September 2030, with the narrower EHCP picture phased towards 2035, so the three-element model and the £6,000 threshold are the rules that govern your budget today.
- See also how to apply for high needs funding for a pupil and the SEND budget pressure facing schools.
Where the law comes from
- DfE: High needs funding 2026 to 2027 operational guide (the £6,000 threshold and top-up funding)
- DfE: The notional SEN budget for mainstream schools, operational guidance 2026 to 2027 (indicative, not ring-fenced)
- Institute for Fiscal Studies: Spending on special educational needs in England (the £6,000 threshold frozen since 2013/14)
Related
This page is general information, not clinical or legal advice.